Wayback Machine alternative

When a public archive is not the record you need

One archives the web on its own schedule and lets everyone read it. The other captures the URLs you name, when you say, into a file you own. Most people searching for this want the first one.

Stay where you are if

You want the public past of pages nobody captured on purpose, or a citable public URL for something already online. A capture starts existing when it is requested, so nothing here reaches back before today.

Move here if

The record has to exist on your schedule, in a format you chose, inside storage you control — and be produced by a request your code can repeat and your auditor can read.

What moving looks like: There is nothing to migrate, because nothing you have is in an export: point requests at the URLs that matter, write the artifacts to your own bucket, and re-issue on the schedule the record needs.

wayback machine alternative · request and resultPAGECAPTURE / 01
cURL
curl -G https://api.pagecapture.dev/v1/take \
  -H "X-Access-Key: $PAGECAPTURE_KEY" \
  --data-urlencode "url=https://example.com/pricing" \
  -d "format=pdf" \
  -d "full_page=true" \
  -d "metadata_page_title=true" \
  -d "metadata_http_response_status_code=true" \
  -d "response_type=json" \
  -o record.json
Capture result
succeeded
https://example.com
Noma
Shop now
NEW COLLECTION

Objects for slower mornings.

Thoughtful essentials, made in small batches from natural materials.

Explore the collection
No. 01 · Hinoki
PLANT-BASEDMADE IN SMALL BATCHESREFILLABLE
Artifact
PNG · 1440×900
Billing
1 credit
Engine
stable

Recorded when you ask

A capture exists because a request was made. Nothing reaches back to a page as it was before you started, and no page you did not name gets captured.

The file is yours

The artifact goes to your bucket with `store`, under a retention policy you set. It does not depend on us staying online to keep existing.

Provenance travels with it

Page title, final URL and the response status code come back alongside the artifact, so the record says what the server actually answered.

Repeatable by construction

The same parameters describe the same capture, so a monthly record is a scheduled request rather than someone remembering to click.

What this costs here

Priced on successful captures that miss cache

Every number in this table is computed from the published plans — failures and organization-scoped cache hits are removed before the plan is chosen, because they are not billable.

ScenarioBillable successesSmallest included planPublished monthly price
10,000 archived pages per month8,820Growth$47.00

Assumes 10% cache hits and 2% failures. Change either assumption and the billable count changes with it — that is the point of charging for success.

What these vendors publish

Wayback Machine, in their own numbers

These figures are quoted from each vendor's own pricing page, with the date we last checked it. They are not converted to our billing unit, because they do not measure the same thing.

Wayback Machine

A public web archive built mostly from its own crawls, with a one-off Save Page Now for a page it has not reached.

How pages enter the archive
Much of our archived web data comes from our own crawls or from Alexa Internet's crawls
Saving a page on request
You can use the Save Page Now feature to save a specific page one time

Published by the vendor, checked 2026-08-26.

archive.org

Wayback Machine is trademarked by their respective owners and mentioned only to describe the comparison people are searching for. No affiliation is claimed.

Questions this raises

Is this affiliated with the Internet Archive?

No. PageCapture is an independent product, and Wayback Machine is a trademark of its owner. This page compares what the two do, using only what they publish about themselves.

Can I get a page as it looked before I started capturing?

No, and this is the honest reason to stay with a public archive: a capture starts existing when it is requested. If the page you need is in the public past, that is where it is.

Is it a drop-in replacement?

It is not a replacement at all. There is no export to migrate and no snapshot history to import — you start recording the URLs that matter from now, and everything already archived publicly stays where it is.

Does it crawl a site the way a web archive does?

No. It captures the URLs you send, one per request or many through the bulk endpoint. There is no spider following links, which is also why it cannot be pointed at a domain and left to run.

What is missing here today?

Region, first, because an archived page can look different by country: there is no managed proxy pool behind ip_country_code, so a page is recorded as it appears from our egress. There is also no GPU pool behind request_gpu_rendering, and checkout is not wired to a merchant of record yet. If your record depends on any of those, this is not the moment to move.