Browserless alternative

A Browserless alternative for teams that want the file, not the browser

Browserless rents you a browser and lets you drive it. We do not: we take a request and return a file. If your workflow needs arbitrary interaction, session state or a CDP connection, they are the right tool and this page will say so.

Stay where you are if

You need to drive the browser: multi-step flows, session state, CDP access or a browser that is not Chromium.

Move here if

Every script you run ends in a screenshot or a PDF, and you would rather send one request than hold a session open.

What moving looks like: This one is a rewrite, not a swap: each script becomes a request. Straightforward when the script ends in a capture, impossible when it does not.

browserless alternative · request and resultPAGECAPTURE / 01
The same job, in our contract
curl -G https://api.pagecapture.dev/v1/take \
  -H "X-Access-Key: $PAGECAPTURE_KEY" \
  --data-urlencode "url=https://example.com" \
  -d "format=pdf" \
  -d "wait_until=load" \
  -d "navigation_timeout=30" \
  -o pagecapture.pdf
Capture result
succeeded
https://example.com
Noma
Shop now
NEW COLLECTION

Objects for slower mornings.

Thoughtful essentials, made in small batches from natural materials.

Explore the collection
No. 01 · Hinoki
PLANT-BASEDMADE IN SMALL BATCHESREFILLABLE
Artifact
PNG · 1440×900
Billing
1 credit
Engine
stable

One request, no session to manage

There is no connection to hold open, no browser to close and no leaked context to pay for. The unit of work is the artifact.

Fewer decisions to get right

Waits, banner blocking, device emulation and full-page slicing are options with documented defaults, not code you write against a remote browser.

Egress policy on every hop

URL, redirect, subresource, storage endpoint and webhook pass the same SSRF policy. Driving a remote browser yourself leaves that boundary to you.

Billed per successful artifact

Not per unit of browser time. A slow page and a fast page cost the same credit, so a hostile target does not surprise the invoice.

What this costs here

Priced on successful captures that miss cache

Every number in this table is computed from the published plans — failures and organization-scoped cache hits are removed before the plan is chosen, because they are not billable.

ScenarioBillable successesSmallest included planPublished monthly price
20,000 page renders per month17,640Scale$155.00

Assumes 10% cache hits and 2% failures. Change either assumption and the billable count changes with it — that is the point of charging for success.

What these vendors publish

Browserless, in their own numbers

These figures are quoted from each vendor's own pricing page, with the date we last checked it. They are not converted to our billing unit, because they do not measure the same thing.

Browserless

Browser-as-a-service for automation, scraping and agents — not only artifacts.

What a unit is
A block of browser time of up to 30 seconds per connection
Free tier
1,000 units per month
20,000 units
US$ 25 per month, billed annually
180,000 units
US$ 140 per month, billed annually

Published by the vendor, checked 2026-08-14.

browserless.io

Browserless is trademarked by their respective owners and mentioned only to describe the comparison people are searching for. No affiliation is claimed.

Questions this raises

Is PageCapture affiliated with Browserless?

No. PageCapture is an independent product with its own implementation. Browserless is a trademark of its owner and is mentioned only to describe the comparison people are searching for.

When should I stay with Browserless?

When you need to drive the browser: multi-step flows, form submission across pages, scraping that depends on session state, CDP access or a browser other than Chromium. None of that is what a capture contract does.

Is it a drop-in replacement?

No, and it is not the same shape of product. Migrating means rewriting a browser script as a request, which is straightforward when the script ends in a screenshot or a PDF and impossible when it does not.

What is missing today?

Exit region is the gap to check first: there is no managed proxy pool behind ip_country_code, so a script that chooses where the request comes from has nowhere to land here yet. There is also no GPU pool behind request_gpu_rendering, and checkout is not wired to a merchant of record. If your migration depends on any of those, this is not the moment to move.